【長難句】
They argue that GM foods have never delivered on their supposed promise, that money spent on GM crops would be better channeled to organic farming and that consumers should be protected with warning labels on any products that contain genetically modified ingredients.
【句子拆分】
主語 They
謂語 argue
賓語 that GM foods have never delivered on their supposed promise
同位語 that money spent on GM crops would be better channeled to organic farming
同位語 that consumers should be protected with warning labels on any products that contain genetically modified ingredients
【單詞解析】
| 單詞 |
音標(biāo) |
中文詞意 |
| organic |
[?:r?gæn?k] |
adj. 有機的；組織的；器官的 |
| label |
?leb?l |
vt. 標(biāo)注；貼標(biāo)簽于n. 標(biāo)簽；商標(biāo)；簽條n. (Label)人名；(法)拉貝爾 |
【語法分析】
這句話是一個主謂賓句型，主語是"they"，謂語是"argue"，"that GM foods have never delivered on their supposed promise"是賓語從句。后面兩個由"that"引導(dǎo)的句子全是同位語從句。
【譯文】
他們認為轉(zhuǎn)基因食品從來沒有兌現(xiàn)它們所謂的承諾。這些承諾是，用在轉(zhuǎn)基因農(nóng)作物上的錢最好轉(zhuǎn)用到有機耕作上，并且任何含有轉(zhuǎn)基因成分的產(chǎn)品都應(yīng)該貼上警告標(biāo)簽，以此來保護消費者。
【考情分析】
這句話的難點在于兩個并行的同位語從句。"that money spent..."和"that consumers should"同是對前面"their supposed promise"的進一步解釋說明。注意第一個同位語從句的主語"money"后面的"spent on..."是過去分詞作定語，它的謂語部分實際上是"be channeled to", "better"因該是做一個狀語。
京公安網(wǎng)備11010802020593號
